Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 05:09:59 07/14/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 14, 2002 at 04:22:50, Tony Hedlund wrote: >On July 13, 2002 at 16:04:08, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On July 13, 2002 at 15:08:15, Christophe Theron wrote: >> >>>On July 13, 2002 at 13:53:36, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>On July 13, 2002 at 10:40:17, Tony Hedlund wrote: >>>> >>>>>[Event "Tony Hedlund"] >>>>>[Site "SSDF"] >>>>>[Date "2002.07.13"] >>>>>[Round "1"] >>>>>[White "Genuis 1 486/66"] >>>>>[Black "Chess Tiger 14.9a Palm"] >>>>>[WhiteElo "2184"] >>>>>[Result "1-0"] >>>>>[Opening "A35 English: Symmetrical, Four Knights System"] >>>>> >>>>>1. c4 c5 2. Nc3 Nc6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. d4 cxd4 5. Nxd4 g6 6. g3 Bg7 7. Bg2 O-O >>>>>8. O-O Nxd4 9. Qxd4 d6 10. Bg5 h6 11. Bd2 Be6 12. Qd3 Qd7 13. Nd5 Nxd5 >>>>>14. cxd5 Bh3 15. Bxh3 Qxh3 16. Rac1 Rfc8 17. e4 b6 18. b3 Rc5 19. Rxc5 bxc5 >>>>>20. Qb5 Kf8 21. b4 cxb4 22. Qxb4 Rc8 23. Be3 a6 24. Qb7 a5 25. Qa6 h5 >>>>>26. Qxa5 Bf6 27. Qa4 h4 28. Rc1 Rxc1+ 29. Bxc1 hxg3 30. hxg3 Be5 >>>>>31. Qc4 Qg4 32. Qc2 Ke8 33. Qa4+ Kd8 34. Qa5+ Kc8 35. Bd2 e6 36. Qa8+ Kd7 >>>>>37. Ba5 exd5 38. Qd8+ Ke6 39. Qc8+ Ke7 40. Qxg4 dxe4 1-0 >>>>> >>>>>Tony >>>> >>>>Isn't Chess Genius rated 2284 on a 486/66 Mhz according to the SSDF 1997 Rating >>>>list. Sorry, I forgot what year the SSDF subtract 100 points from the Rating >>>>list, was it in 1999? >>>> >>>> 43 Chessmaster 4000 486/50-66 MHz 2292 34 -33 462 66% 2172 >>>> 44 Chess Genius 1.0 486/50-66 MHz 2284 23 -23 931 54% 2257 >>>> 45 Rebel Decade Pentium 90 MHz 2279 29 -30 563 45% 2316 >>>> >>>>Pichard >>> >>> >>> >>>From the latest list: >>> >>> 106 Chess Genius 1.0 486/50-66 MHz 2182 23 -23 931 54% 2154 >>> >>>I predict that Chess Tiger is going to have a VERY hard time against this >>>opponent. It might not win a single game at all. >>> >>>*sigh* >>> > > >>> Christophe >Why so pessimistic? It's weaker then Comet and Tal I don't understand Christophe reaction, since a player rated 2182 like Chess Genius on 486 66 Mhz should NOT score over 70% higher than a player estimated to be 2125 like CT 14.9 for Palm. Pichard >> >>It would have been better to test Fritz 3 vs CT 14.9 on a 486/50-66 Mhz >> >> 85 Fritz 3.0 486/50-66 MHz 2156 20 -20 1226 45% 2190 >> 86 Mephisto Lyon 68030 36 MHz 2151 28 -27 716 68% 2016 >> >> >>Pichard > >Even better would be Kallisto 1.82-1.83 2110 21 -22 1077 41% 2172 >if I could get it. Why not Mephisto RISC 2 2125 ETC.................. >It might be Fritz 3 in the next match. I think Bertil have it. > >/Tony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.