Author: Harald Faber
Date: 22:05:06 07/14/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 14, 2002 at 11:58:11, Marc van Hal wrote: >On July 14, 2002 at 09:25:34, Tony Hedlund wrote: > >>On July 14, 2002 at 09:10:37, stuart taylor wrote: >> >>>On July 14, 2002 at 08:16:53, pavel wrote: >>> >>>>Hey Tony, >>>> When can we expect the next SSDF list? >>>> >>>>cheers, >>>>pavs >>> >>>So why does this happen? Maybe this is a new version which is stronger now? Has >>>this version ever been on the ssdf list yet? >> >>Probably not. >> >>>And in the past, Shredder often has great successes whereas its induvidual >>>results and ssdf are not usually the very top. >>>S.Taylor >> >>Perhaps Stefan have a special tournament book. And in matchplay Shredders >>learning might not be as good as the top programs. But this is just guesses >>from me, I don't know. >> >>Tony > >If that would be treu the tournaments should demand the book which comes with >the comercial program has to been used. >Why is is it in chessworld always that so many people want to create unfair >circumstances >All these people who do so don't belong at the noble sport of chess. >Chess is the search for treuth! >not lies. >Besides there are already more then enough lies outside the chessworld. >So no need for with in. > >Marc van Hal Don't you think that the other teams have their own book for tourneys like wccc? Of course they have. And don't you think that providing these books in a comercial version would give a (small?) advantage out of hand for the next championships? Can you imagine that the commercial book also has the target to provide a wide book so that YOU have fun to play with? E.g. although the King's Indian is no preferred opening choice for a computer to play black, this opening is still in several opening books. Guess why.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.