Author: Aaron Tay
Date: 06:40:30 07/15/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 15, 2002 at 08:10:10, Omid David wrote: >It's not an 'open question'! as Smirin recently proved, humans are still far >superior than computers. Kasparov's loss was a terrible bad luck (+ dirty tricks >on IBM's behalf). > >I strongly believe that all chess programs are dump, not being able to see some >of the obvious positional elements in a position. If a chess program like Junior >or Fritz loses 5 games in 100 to me (2250 Elo), it means that computers are by >no means superior to humans. (I certainly won't be able to beat a 2700 Elo Human >5 times in 100 matches!) > >P.S. >I'm saying this despite my being a chess programmer. You might change your mind when you become a COMMERCIAL chess programmer with a product to sell and then suddenly your "baby" is World class player capable of going toe to toe with kasparov and deep blue is a toy.. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.