Author: Omid David
Date: 08:29:57 07/15/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 15, 2002 at 09:40:30, Aaron Tay wrote: >On July 15, 2002 at 08:10:10, Omid David wrote: > >>It's not an 'open question'! as Smirin recently proved, humans are still far >>superior than computers. Kasparov's loss was a terrible bad luck (+ dirty tricks >>on IBM's behalf). >> >>I strongly believe that all chess programs are dump, not being able to see some >>of the obvious positional elements in a position. If a chess program like Junior >>or Fritz loses 5 games in 100 to me (2250 Elo), it means that computers are by >>no means superior to humans. (I certainly won't be able to beat a 2700 Elo Human >>5 times in 100 matches!) >> >>P.S. >>I'm saying this despite my being a chess programmer. > >You might change your mind when you become a COMMERCIAL chess programmer with a >product to sell and then suddenly your "baby" is World class player capable of >going toe to toe with kasparov and deep blue is a toy.. :) When I become a commercial chess programmer, I hope no one remembers my current comments ;-) But that won't mean they aren't true!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.