Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Null-Move: Difference between R = 2 and R = 3 in action

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 10:30:54 07/15/02

Go up one level in this thread


On July 15, 2002 at 13:11:09, Christophe Theron wrote:

>Why does double null move prove that null move is a correct search method????
>
>Doing two null moves in a row means going back to standard search (a search not
>involving an illegal move like null move is).
>
>I fail to see how it legitimates null move.

I think the idea is simply to show that you can nullmove and still
have a correct search. (but only with double nullmove, not single)

--
GCP



This page took 0.1 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.