Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Question for Dan Corbit

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 23:53:38 07/15/02

Go up one level in this thread


On July 16, 2002 at 02:49:44, Russell Reagan wrote:

>On July 16, 2002 at 02:09:17, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>>>So if after a comp tournament we all go home and study--study---study the
>>>opening lines used, and incorporate something played by another program in our
>>>own program, some say this is stealing, or not the correct thing to do.
>>
>>Whoever said that?  If a program plays a line in a public game, then that
>>becomes public knowledge.  For instance, the SSDF games are all free game for
>>opening book inclusion.
>
>What if a GM friend of yours showed you a new line he was thinking about? You
>are well within your rights to play it and/or add it to your opening book. Along
>that same line of thinking, why is it wrong if someone buys Rebel-Tiger and then
>plays through the opening book and gets a lot of good lines from it? Sure, maybe
>it's wrong, but why?

If there are public games played and good moves are extracted from the outcome,
I see that as no different from extracting them from GM games.

However, if you deliberately try to pump a book (for instance by playing 10,000
blitz games with an intent of recovering the book data) then you are stealing.

If a furor has arisen over a single line or perhaps two lines from a book, then
I think the complaint is pompous foolishness.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.