Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Humans are far superior than computers...

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 14:26:28 07/16/02

Go up one level in this thread


On July 16, 2002 at 16:08:01, Amir Ban wrote:

>On July 15, 2002 at 08:10:10, Omid David wrote:
>
>>
>>I strongly believe that all chess programs are dump, not being able to see some
>>of the obvious positional elements in a position. If a chess program like Junior
>>or Fritz loses 5 games in 100 to me (2250 Elo), it means that computers are by
>>no means superior to humans. (I certainly won't be able to beat a 2700 Elo Human
>>5 times in 100 matches!)
>>
>
>A 2700 Elo player is 450 rating points better and so should beat you about 10 to
>1.
>
>If you score only 5% against a program, then its rating is higher than 2700.
>
>Amir

Is there a statistics about games of 2700 players against 2250 players?

Note that it is possible to score 10 points out of 100 without winning a single
game and Omid David did not say that he can score only 5% against chess programs
but that he can win 5 games out of 100.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.