Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 16:06:25 07/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 16, 2002 at 18:33:25, Dann Corbit wrote: >On July 16, 2002 at 18:27:24, Kevin Strickland wrote: >[snip] >>>5) There is no need for a prize fund. If you have excess cash, subsidize the >>>beer. >> >>Now finally we can agree on something. Lower cost beer is something I dream >>about daily. > >Another reason not to have big prize funds: >It would encourage cheating. There are enough problems with claims of cheating >already. > >On the other hand, I think that sponsors could be very useful if they could fly >people to the event who could not normally afford it. > >Imagine if chess engines from Uruguay and Africa could be present. Wouldn't it >be nice if New Zealand and Australia and Viet Nam could be represented? > >I pretty much guarantee that you will get as many participants as free trips >that you can arrange. So if you can cough up 100 plane fares, you will have 100 >entrants for sure. That is a lot of money to fly in the Europeans, who do not fly in the North Americans, ever. This is another reason to make it a North American Open. Why fly people in from Uruguay if it has some geographical connotation? Flying people around costs a lot of money, and I'd rather he actually do the event than get caught up trying to raise plane fair for who knows who, and end up choking to death. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.