Author: Kim Hvarre
Date: 06:11:16 08/07/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 06, 1998 at 23:09:17, Ed Schröder wrote: snip > >I can not recommend "sel=3" being stronger than the default setting. But >"sel=3" isn't a bad choice and "sel=4" / "sel=5" are also good options, maybe >3/4/5 come close to Rebel's standard setting. > >Solution times (PII-266) of R10 for the 3 positions... > >Rxd7 0:08 >Rxc6 0:02 >Rxa7 0:08 > >Still not perfect but definitely better than R9. > >- Ed - !! nice times still with som kind of selectivity. I oc tried with pure BF and with sel=1,2,3,4,(5) - the example (3) was a kind of compromise;). Sort of a conclusion; Rebel10 = a little brigther on the matter selectivity. Looking forward to it. Another "hidden" conclusion; No I don't get a "Rebel10" with sel=3 + 1.3xtime x (Rebel9). (next time - Rebel11 - then give us even some more control with the diff. parameters, but WTH, I still buy it...) Regards, kim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.