Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 20:00:25 07/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 16, 2002 at 18:25:02, Uri Blass wrote: [snip] >I disagree and I do not have a big book. >I believe that people overestimate the importance of books. There is something to that statement. Especially since many losses are book losses. I guess what I am saying is that a bad book can be worse than no book. I remember many occasions where programs have fallen out of book in a contest in a position so bad that it was lost the moment the program left it. So I think a book can be either a great power for strength -- or *weakness* !
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.