Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:32:32 07/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 16, 2002 at 23:39:33, Russell Reagan wrote: >On July 16, 2002 at 20:31:49, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>I thought Uri said "corner squares". Which is more dangerous than "corner >>squares on the enemy side of the board". But even then there are probably ways >>to exploit a program that thinks a knight on a8 is really bad... > >I think there must be a superior method than assigning values to squares like >this. By this method, a strong player would pick the program apart. If a more >general method was found, there wouldn't be the need to patch up our programs >with exception after exception. Surely piece square tables are not the best >we've got? > >Russell I do not see how a strong player can take advantage of the fact that the program is using also a piece square table. I do not see how he can produce in a game a position when sacrificing a pawn for knight in the corner is bad. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.