Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The failure of validation with DEEP BLUE 2

Author: K. Burcham

Date: 08:54:20 07/17/02

Go up one level in this thread



You _can_ disprove Kasparov's main "claim".  That "no computer would play ..."
By demonstrating that at _least_ one computer _would_ play that move, his
statement is disproven for all time.  And the rest of his claim can therefore
be taken with a mountain of salt.

Robert




Robert, the more I study this position and read Kasparov's comments
about this line with these three moves, the more I think Kasparov (at the time
of the comments) misunderstood the position and the variations surrouding the
Qb6, Be4, and the move axb5. and also did not understand the capabilities of
what a programmer can accomplish in this game of chess. I believe that his
opinion of programmers and chess programs has changed tremendously, especially
with todays hardware and todays chess programs.

kburcham




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.