Author: Omid David
Date: 09:00:29 07/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 16, 2002 at 17:26:28, Uri Blass wrote: >On July 16, 2002 at 16:08:01, Amir Ban wrote: > >>On July 15, 2002 at 08:10:10, Omid David wrote: >> >>> >>>I strongly believe that all chess programs are dump, not being able to see some >>>of the obvious positional elements in a position. If a chess program like Junior >>>or Fritz loses 5 games in 100 to me (2250 Elo), it means that computers are by >>>no means superior to humans. (I certainly won't be able to beat a 2700 Elo Human >>>5 times in 100 matches!) >>> >> >>A 2700 Elo player is 450 rating points better and so should beat you about 10 to >>1. >> >>If you score only 5% against a program, then its rating is higher than 2700. >> >>Amir > >Is there a statistics about games of 2700 players against 2250 players? > >Note that it is possible to score 10 points out of 100 without winning a single >game and Omid David did not say that he can score only 5% against chess programs >but that he can win 5 games out of 100. > >Uri Yes, I usually score way above 10% that including many draws. My *winning* rate is about 5% (when I manage to close the center in openings like English or King's Indian, and start a pawn storm). Omid.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.