Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 10:55:14 07/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 16, 2002 at 02:15:11, Uri Blass wrote: >On July 15, 2002 at 18:37:56, Alexander Kure wrote: > >>On July 15, 2002 at 18:34:10, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On July 15, 2002 at 18:12:48, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >>> >>>>On July 15, 2002 at 18:01:11, Uri Blass wrote: >>>> >>>>>Another question is what do you mean by a winning score. >>>>> >>>>>Suppose that I can see Qh5 with +0.97 score when another move has +0.56 score. >>>>>Does it mean that Qh5 has a winning score? >>>> >>>>Win of a piece (possibly for a pawn), so something around +2. >>>> >>>>-- >>>>GCP >>> >>>programs may see also only rook and 2 pawns for bishop and knight so the score >>>may be only +1. >>> >>>Here are some computer lines: >>>f4g6 f7g6 c2g6 h7g6 h5g6 g8h8 g6h5 h8g8 c1h6 e7f6 h5g6 g8h8 h6f8 f6e5 d4e5 d8f8 >>> >>>f4g6 f7g6 c2g6 h7g6 h5g6 g8h8 g6h5 h8g8 c1h6 e7f6 h5g6 g8h8 h6f8 f6e5 g6h5 h8g8 >>>d4e5 d8f8 h5g4 g8h7 >>> >>> >>>Uri >> >>The double piece sac is quite spectacular, but the winning continuation is the >>very strong intermediate move Re1!! (instead of Qh5). >> >>Greetings >>Alex > >I suspect that finding Re1 may be even bigger problem than finding Qh5 I'm not convinced it's the only way to win. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.