Author: Slater Wold
Date: 20:58:14 07/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 17, 2002 at 21:49:14, Joshua Lee wrote: >On July 17, 2002 at 18:52:47, Slater Wold wrote: > >>W,S - Deep Junior 7 >>1br1r1k1/1b1q1pp1/p1p2n1p/1p2n3/1P6/PNN1P3/2QBBPPP/4RRK1 b - - 0 1 >> >>Analysis by Deep Junior 7: >> >>1...Neg4 2.h3 Nh2 >> ³ (-0.36) Depth: 3 00:00:00 >>1...Neg4! >> ³ (-0.66) Depth: 6 00:00:00 3kN >>1...Neg4! >> ³ (-0.66) Depth: 6 00:00:00 3kN >>1...Neg4 2.Nc5 Bxh2+ 3.Kh1 Qc7 4.Nxb7 Qxb7 5.f3 Nd5 6.fxg4 Nxe3 7.Bxe3 >> = (-0.15) Depth: 9 00:00:00 150kN >>1...c5 2.bxc5 Qc6 3.e4 Nc4 4.Bf3 Nxd2 5.Qxd2 >> ³ (-0.34) Depth: 9 00:00:00 180kN >>1...Nc4 2.Bxc4 bxc4 >> ³ (-0.36) Depth: 9 00:00:00 266kN >>1...Nc4 2.Bxc4 >> = (-0.06) Depth: 12 00:00:00 775kN >>1...c5 2.bxc5 Qc6 3.e4 Nc4 4.Bf3 Qc7 5.g3 Nxa3 >> ³ (-0.44) Depth: 12 00:00:00 1177kN >>1...c5 2.bxc5 Nc4 3.Bc1 Qc6 4.e4 Nxe4 5.Nxe4 Qxe4 6.Qxe4 Bxe4 7.Bh5 >> µ (-0.72) Depth: 15 00:00:04 10707kN >>1...c5 2.Nxc5 Nf3+ 3.Bxf3 Qd6 4.g3 Bxf3 5.e4 Qe5 6.Nxa6 Nxe4 7.Re3 Red8 8.Nxb8 >>Qxb8 9.Be1 Ng5 10.Re7 >> ³ (-0.51) Depth: 18 00:01:17 170263kN >>1...c5 2.Nxc5 Nf3+ 3.Bxf3 Qd6 4.g3 Bxf3 5.e4 Ng4 6.Nd5 Qe5 7.Bc3 Qh5 8.h4 Be5 >>9.Bxe5 >> ³ (-0.61) Depth: 20 00:04:14 539289kN >>1...c5 2.bxc5 Nc4 3.Bc1 Qc7 4.g3 Ba7 5.a4 Bxc5 6.axb5 axb5 7.Nxb5 Qc6 8.e4 Bxf2+ >>9.Rxf2 Qxb5 >> µ (-0.71) Depth: 21 00:21:03 2726068kN >> >>(W, 17.07.2002) > >While not 22 Nxc5 RxN! 23 pxR Nf3+ etc. it's clear that The Move order would >work itself out but how about the position with Black to Play RxN! will DJ7 find >that? I am very impressed DJ7 might be the next program i get No. DJ thinks Rxc5 is a *lot* worse than Nf3+. That's why the lines don't match. So perhaps the correct positon to look at would be Rxc5. However, with about 30 minutes of looking, I don't see the benefit sac'ing the rook. Neither did several engines I tested.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.