Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 01:00:16 07/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 17, 2002 at 18:02:31, Uri Blass wrote: > >It is possible that it is not important for the best programs but >I can show you examples that it important for weaker programs and your program >is still not in the team of the best programs. > >I think that movei is clearly better than monarch if you use 40 minutes/40 moves >time control(see the results of leo's tournament) but it is not the case if you >use faster time control. > >Monarch and faile are at similiar level at 40/40 based on Leo's tournament. >It is not the case when you use blitz time control and monarch is clearly better >than faile at that time control. > >Movei is losing against tscp if I tell it to play 5 times faster at 1 minute per >game on p800. > >If I do the same with 10 minutes per game then movei is clearly winning. >Imagine an engine that is 5 times slower than movei. > >It is going to lose against tscp at bullet and win against it at longer time >control. Heh, that is why I said "good" engines:) The curves cross here because Movei is slower in terms of speed, but has a lower branch factor. I think if Movei was as fast as TSCP, then Movei would be stronger at any time control. -S. >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.