Author: Uri Blass
Date: 01:22:29 07/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 18, 2002 at 04:00:16, Sune Fischer wrote: >On July 17, 2002 at 18:02:31, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>It is possible that it is not important for the best programs but >>I can show you examples that it important for weaker programs and your program >>is still not in the team of the best programs. >> >>I think that movei is clearly better than monarch if you use 40 minutes/40 moves >>time control(see the results of leo's tournament) but it is not the case if you >>use faster time control. >> >>Monarch and faile are at similiar level at 40/40 based on Leo's tournament. >>It is not the case when you use blitz time control and monarch is clearly better >>than faile at that time control. >> >>Movei is losing against tscp if I tell it to play 5 times faster at 1 minute per >>game on p800. >> >>If I do the same with 10 minutes per game then movei is clearly winning. >>Imagine an engine that is 5 times slower than movei. >> >>It is going to lose against tscp at bullet and win against it at longer time >>control. > >Heh, that is why I said "good" engines:) >The curves cross here because Movei is slower in terms of speed, but has a lower >branch factor. >I think if Movei was as fast as TSCP, then Movei would be stronger at any time >control. Movei has similiar speed to tscp. The last comparison was between tscp and a theoretic version of movei that is 5 times slower than movei and the rest is the same. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.