Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:48:44 07/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 17, 2002 at 14:43:45, Omid David wrote: >On July 17, 2002 at 13:08:54, Russell Reagan wrote: > >>On July 17, 2002 at 09:15:51, David Dory wrote: >> >>>4) A good IM or GM to discuss the games subtleties in the final decisive games >>> I thought Mike Valvo and David Levy added HUGELY to the ACM CC events. >>> >>> As in Maastricht, would be great if he could play a simul or ??. >> >>I like the master playing a simul. I assume you mean against the programmers? >>That would be fun, IMO. I don't think playing a simul against the computers >>would be very fun, as the master would probably get blasted off the majority of >>the boards. I also like the idea about having different titles, and about >>promoting compute chess in North America first, then South America, then other >>places where it is not popular, then to Europe last, since they are the people >>who already have a great interest in the sport. >> >>Russell > > >It'd be nice if a little blitz tourney between programmers is held! A test for >importance of chess knowledge on the part of programmer. I do not think that a blitz tournament can show the chess knowledge of the programmers. I believe that I am relatively better at longer time control and at blitz I am probably 200 elo weaker(1800 at blitz and 2000 at tournament time control). I cannot play a single game blindfold but memory and not chess knowledge is needed to play blindfold. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.