Author: Omid David
Date: 10:11:31 07/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 18, 2002 at 11:48:44, Uri Blass wrote: >On July 17, 2002 at 14:43:45, Omid David wrote: > >>On July 17, 2002 at 13:08:54, Russell Reagan wrote: >> >>>On July 17, 2002 at 09:15:51, David Dory wrote: >>> >>>>4) A good IM or GM to discuss the games subtleties in the final decisive games >>>> I thought Mike Valvo and David Levy added HUGELY to the ACM CC events. >>>> >>>> As in Maastricht, would be great if he could play a simul or ??. >>> >>>I like the master playing a simul. I assume you mean against the programmers? >>>That would be fun, IMO. I don't think playing a simul against the computers >>>would be very fun, as the master would probably get blasted off the majority of >>>the boards. I also like the idea about having different titles, and about >>>promoting compute chess in North America first, then South America, then other >>>places where it is not popular, then to Europe last, since they are the people >>>who already have a great interest in the sport. >>> >>>Russell >> >> >>It'd be nice if a little blitz tourney between programmers is held! A test for >>importance of chess knowledge on the part of programmer. > >I do not think that a blitz tournament can show the chess knowledge of the >programmers. > >I believe that I am relatively better at longer time control and at blitz I am >probably 200 elo weaker(1800 at blitz and 2000 at tournament time control). > >I cannot play a single game blindfold but memory and not chess knowledge is >needed to play blindfold. > >Uri I'm awful at blitz too :-( Once I player simultaneous blindfold chess with four people. I won 2, lost 2, and got a headache for several days!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.