Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 10:36:58 07/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 18, 2002 at 13:02:42, James Swafford wrote:
>On July 18, 2002 at 13:01:36, James Swafford wrote:
>
>>On July 17, 2002 at 17:29:49, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>
>>>On July 17, 2002 at 16:30:24, Patrik wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hello, Dr Hyatt.
>>>>
>>>> if (do_null && !tree->in_check[ply] && pieces && (pieces>5 || depth<421)) {
>>>>
>>>>Where does the depth 421 come from?
>>>
>>>It appears to be about 7 plies, since INCPLY is 60.
>>
>>So does null move break if you set INCPLY to something else?
>>Seems ... || depth < INCPLY*7)) {
>
>depth < (INCPLY * 7 + 1))
Yes, that would be a good idea.
Since he is very good at using INCLPLY every where else, I suspect he was doing
some sort of binary search for the best value and just left the constant in when
he found it.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.