Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Dortmund === Topalov-Bareev [The combination that won the tiebreak]

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 14:45:03 07/18/02

Go up one level in this thread


On July 18, 2002 at 15:33:23, Rolf Tueschen wrote:

>On July 18, 2002 at 15:03:16, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On July 18, 2002 at 15:02:12, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>On July 18, 2002 at 14:07:24, José Antônio Fabiano Mendes wrote:
>>>
>>>>       Topalov-Bareev,Dortmund,July 2002
>>>> Source ==> http://www.chessbase.com/events/events.asp?pid=164
>>>>     [D]r6r/k4pp1/pq2p2p/1p1n4/3N3P/1R6/PPP1QPP1/2KR4 w
>>>>     23. Nxb5+! axb5 24. Rxb5 Qc6 25. Rdxd5 exd5 26. Qe7+ Ka6 28. Rb3 1-0
>>>
>>>
>>>It is a one minute combination for Crafty.  I assume others will probably
>>>find this _far_ faster...
>>>
>>>         (2)   10    38.35   1.14   1. Qe5 g6 2. Rf3 Rh7 3. Qe4 Re8 4.
>>>                                    Rb3 f5 5. Qd3 Kb8
>>>               10    59.44     ++   1. Nxb5+!!
>>>               10     1:02   3.05   1. Nxb5+ axb5 2. Rxb5 Qd6 3. Rd4 Nc3
>>>                                    4. Qd2 Qc7 5. Qxc3 Qxc3 6. Ra4+ Qa5
>>>                                    7. Rbxa5+
>>>         (4)   10->   1:02   3.05   1. Nxb5+ axb5 2. Rxb5 Qd6 3. Rd4 Nc3
>>>                                    4. Qd2 Qc7 5. Qxc3 Qxc3 6. Ra4+ Qa5
>>>                                    7. Rbxa5+
>>>               11     1:03     ++   1. Nxb5+!!
>>>         (3)   11     1:09   4.20   1. Nxb5+ axb5 2. Rxb5 Qd6 3. Rd4 Nc3
>>>                                    4. Ra5+ Kb7 5. bxc3 Qxd4 6. Qf3+ Qd5
>>>                                    7. Qxf7+ Kc6 8. Rxd5 exd5 9. Qxg7
>>>               11->   1:11   4.20   1. Nxb5+ axb5 2. Rxb5 Qd6 3. Rd4 Nc3
>>>                                    4. Ra5+ Kb7 5. bxc3 Qxd4 6. Qf3+ Qd5
>>>                                    7. Qxf7+ Kc6 8. Rxd5 exd5 9. Qxg7
>>>               12     1:17     ++   1. Nxb5+!!
>>
>>
>>That was on a quad 400, the quad 700 was analyzing the current Topolov game
>>in real-time on ICC.  It is about 2x faster than the 400 so this should be maybe
>>a 30 second position then...
>
>give us please a little example out of the actual game in dortmund, thanks.
>is it a fortress?
>
>rolf


I don't know what you mean "is it a fortress?"  No, this isn't a fortress
position if that is your question.  But as far as a "little example" I don't
understand at all...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.