Author: Slater Wold
Date: 15:17:31 07/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 18, 2002 at 18:02:01, Ron Langeveld wrote: >Haven't I seen this post before ? Very possible. I did post it a while back. >Your AMD results are not reproducable. Sorry? Yes they are. Not only did I use *my* AMD 1.73Ghz but also another member of CCC to compare to the 2.53Ghz. >Not only do I get better performance, I also get different lines. No you don't. >I suppose my reply to the earlier post is still in the archives. I never saw anything from you. Those threads were a little long though. It's possible I overlooked it. >I'm getting a bit bored by your tenacity to justify any purchase. Huh? He asked for a comparison between AMD and Intel. I gave it to him. >The following quote from Tomshardware comes to mind: > >"Intel or AMD - who cares?! Nvidia or ATI - who cares?! Windows or Linux - who >cares?! It's about the experience. The technology. It's the journey, not the >destination. There is no end point. No perfect buy. No perfect company. No >perfect chip. Stop looking for your identity in a piece of hardware!" > >http://www.tomshardware.com/smoke/02q3/020715/smoke-05.html#conclusion
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.