Author: Aaron Gordon
Date: 18:40:58 07/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 18, 2002 at 21:10:24, Slater Wold wrote: >You're not looking very hard, obviously. > >We have the same times on the first 11 plies using F7. > >And then after a few minutes, the 67mhz starts showing. 2 second gain by the >12th ply and 6 seconds on the 13th. > >Not sure what the point was here. And also it's good to know the AMD 2200 is >faster than the 2.53Ghz P4. I was merely trying to point out that the percentage difference between our chips is rather large. Just giving you a hard time about your motherboard again, Slate. :) Your 1.73 w/ Fritz7 @ Depth 13/40 took 1 minute, 3 seconds. My 1.8 w/ same settings took 57 seconds. 10.526% difference, you'd need an AthlonXP 1.915GHz chip (w/ your current settings) to equal this 1.8. Your 1.73 w/ Hiarcs8 @ Depth 12/34 took 1 minute, 23 seconds. My 1.8 w/ same settings took 1 minute, 12 seconds. 15.277% difference, you'd need an AthlonXP 1997MHz to equal this 1.8. Your 1.73 w/ Shredder PB @ Depth 13/26 took 1 minute, 24 seconds. My 1.8 w/ same settings took 1 minute, 10 seconds. 20% difference. You'd need to be at 2079.6MHz to equal the 1.8. Back to my previous statement. Something is wrong with your box. Mine isn't "magically" fast. It's just as fast as anyone else with a similar setup. I can test with my friends machine if you'd like.. although he'd score a little higher than I do due to him having the Epox 8K3A and I'm using an older Asus A7V266-E...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.