Author: Slater Wold
Date: 19:19:15 07/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 18, 2002 at 21:40:58, Aaron Gordon wrote: >On July 18, 2002 at 21:10:24, Slater Wold wrote: > >>You're not looking very hard, obviously. >> >>We have the same times on the first 11 plies using F7. >> >>And then after a few minutes, the 67mhz starts showing. 2 second gain by the >>12th ply and 6 seconds on the 13th. >> >>Not sure what the point was here. And also it's good to know the AMD 2200 is >>faster than the 2.53Ghz P4. > >I was merely trying to point out that the percentage difference between our >chips is rather large. Just giving you a hard time about your motherboard again, >Slate. :) > >Your 1.73 w/ Fritz7 @ Depth 13/40 took 1 minute, 3 seconds. >My 1.8 w/ same settings took 57 seconds. >10.526% difference, you'd need an AthlonXP 1.915GHz chip (w/ your current >settings) to equal this 1.8. > >Your 1.73 w/ Hiarcs8 @ Depth 12/34 took 1 minute, 23 seconds. >My 1.8 w/ same settings took 1 minute, 12 seconds. >15.277% difference, you'd need an AthlonXP 1997MHz to equal this 1.8. > >Your 1.73 w/ Shredder PB @ Depth 13/26 took 1 minute, 24 seconds. >My 1.8 w/ same settings took 1 minute, 10 seconds. >20% difference. You'd need to be at 2079.6MHz to equal the 1.8. > >Back to my previous statement. Something is wrong with your box. Mine isn't >"magically" fast. It's just as fast as anyone else with a similar setup. I can >test with my friends machine if you'd like.. although he'd score a little higher >than I do due to him having the Epox 8K3A and I'm using an older Asus >A7V266-E... There is nothing *wrong* with my box. They are just "different". And mine is setup to run optimal as a dual. Not as a single CPU system.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.