Author: Aaron Gordon
Date: 22:01:35 07/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 18, 2002 at 23:21:33, Slater Wold wrote: >On July 18, 2002 at 22:59:28, Aaron Gordon wrote: > >>On July 18, 2002 at 22:19:15, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>There is nothing *wrong* with my box. They are just "different". >>> >>>And mine is setup to run optimal as a dual. Not as a single CPU system. >> >>Then my suggestion to you is to stop providing benchmarks with that system when >>it comes to "AMD vs Intel". That is not the proper setup to make an accurate >>comparison with. It gives people false impressions. > >I had another member of CCC run these positions on his 1.73Ghz and send me the >output. > >They were within 2% of each other. > >They would be within 2% of yours also, if you were running a stock 1.73Ghz. I'm not sure where you went to school but uh.. either you didn't pay attention or they have some REALLY low standards. If you think me dropping 67MHz off 1.8GHz is going to make me lose 10-20% between those engines you are sadly mistaken. Going from 1733 to 1800 is a 3.866% increase. Going from 1800 to 1733 is a 3.722% decrease. I'm not going to argue with you on this one. It's a waste of forum space and you simply do not want to see the truth.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.