Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The last version of Junior has better understanding of the nunn match.

Author: blass uri

Date: 20:34:39 08/07/98

Go up one level in this thread



On August 07, 1998 at 22:36:56, Mark Young wrote:

>On August 07, 1998 at 20:37:49, blass uri wrote:
>
>>I did the first 10 games of the nunn match between the last version of Junior
>>Amir Ban sent me and fritz5(30 minutes per game +30 seconds per move)
>>and now Junior has better results.
>>7.5:2.5 for Junior(the result of the match with the previous version Amir Ban
>>sent me was 5.5:4.5 for fritz).
>>
>>I was not satisfied by the results of Junior against Fritz in the long games
>>Anand-Rebel from move 11 (in 30 minutes per game+30 seconds per move the result
>>was 3.5:.5 for fritz5.  and in 4 hours per 40 moves I did 2 games
>>one game was a draw when fritz5 missed a win and 1 game was not finished and I
>>stopped it in a position that fritz5 has the advantage.
>>I sent these games to Amir Ban and I hope he will improve his program.
>>
>>Uri
>
>This is still a good result for Junior, at least at the faster time controls.
>And looking at its ICC rating Junior should be a killer blitz program. Would you
>also test the current version of junior with Hiarcs or Junior 4.6?

I did not test it against Hiarcs because I do not have Hiarcs
I cannot test it against Junior4.6 because I had to copy the file JR_49.dll
over JR_46.dll in order to use it.
Fritz5 call my program Junior4.6 but I know it is not Junior4.6
one thing it knows is not to create the illusion it thinks about illegal moves
when it does not compute moves I get -- in the place of the move.

Uri
>So we can see
>how it does playing other programs as well. Thanks for posting your results.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.