Author: Alejandro Dubrovsky
Date: 10:44:08 07/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 19, 2002 at 11:37:03, Uri Blass wrote: >>sure. but there isn't anything much more complicated where a static evaluator >>would be reasonably expected to declare a draw either. eg >>[D]4k3/p4rr1/Pp1p4/1PpPp3/2P1Pp1p/5PpP/1RBR2P1/4K3 w >> >>smallpotato here doesn't even get to 20 in any nice time, but there are programs >>that would get to 100 rather quickly i believe, and be able to call it. i don't >>think there would be many positions with more pieces than this that a static >>evaluator would be able to declare as a draw > >I do not believe that there are programs that can >get 100 plies quickly here. > >You need to consider options like sacrificing the rook and program search >capture the rook first so they have no chance to get 100 plies. > yes, you are probably right. (crafty is struggling to get to 30)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.