Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 14:08:00 07/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 19, 2002 at 15:44:06, Bruce Moreland wrote: I wasted in 2000 time to Peter Skinner when he wanted to organize a tournament. After it turned out to be a shithead, who i took serious after he had called me, i then dropped the idea. As usual i hardly read postings from dudes who are in my alltime idiots gallery (currently Russell Reagan topping with the funny question where we need an openings book at all for), otherwise i would have seen of course sooner that Strickland = Skinner. When i read about the tournament here i directly realized that i had censored a bunch of accounts at different servers from Strickland and less from Peter Skinner. Also i realized that Peter Skinner had dissappeared from online computerchess, which in itself is amazing and not logical at all, as idiots have all time of their life to practice their favourite hobby. And when i read that both Skinner and Strickland had 100% the same ideas to setup a tournament, using the same childish way of writing, it was obvious from my side that Skinner = Strickland. Some pressure onto the ICGA to organize something in USA (which ain't going to happen if israel has a few dollars for Levy to organize world champs 2004 in israel) i found great. That's why i didn't tell anyone what my guess was, for which i apologize. Then i started talking online with some Americans who were celebrating the postings here as if they were going to get a second chance in life. It's then that i realized that i should ship a few persons the truth regarding Strickland's idiocy here, to prevent them from wasting more time onto Skinner. Note that i even had missed a few postings where he claimed several things among which to have sponsors. 100% the same words he used in 2000 towards me and several european computerchess enthusiastics who favoured the idea to setup something in North America's again. When a few days later Skinner posted how good Skinner is, i was of course under my chair from laughter. This posting i consider to be literature in my alltime gallery :) Best regards, Vincent >On July 19, 2002 at 15:08:46, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>Before you hit your ceiling, Bruce, let me give you back a little bit what you >>did in my favor - what if the name Peter Skinner is a pseudonym? Perhaps you >>should ask there for the incidents Kevin mentioned? Excuse me, that is all I can >>say. I'm not in the debate. > >He has the opportunity to respond. I don't think anyone can accuse me of having >anything against either Skinner or Strickland. I saw specific claims that could >be checked out, I checked them out, and they don't check out. If the claims had >checked out, I would have reported this. > >If there is a pseudonym involved here, with luck I'll get the real name and an >explanation of why a pseudonym was used, and I'll try again. > >If the explanation is that there is a pseudonym involved, but I can't get the >real name, and I can't check anything out, I think everyone is competent to form >their own opinions about what is going on. > >bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.