Author: Kevin Strickland
Date: 21:58:18 07/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
>>I am trying to locate information on the internet in regards to the medal he >>recieved in 2000 from the Royal Canadian Humane Association. > >In the other post you said 2001. In fact it was April 3, 2000 that he recieved the medal. I believe I can get the name of the person that over saw the presenting of the medal. > >>He is about to recieve a Certificate of Commendation from the Canadian Govenors >>General Adrienne Clarkson. She certifies this award of the recommendation from >>the Canadian Decorations Advisory Committee. >> >>The article I mention stated that our Mayor, Bill Smith, will be giving the >>award to Peter via the Govenor General. > >I sent the mayor an email. In the meantime I couldn't find anything on the >Governor General's site, which seemed to be heavily cross-referenced by light on >actual data. That is fine. I know for a _fact_ he is recieving this commendation. > >>I have tried to contact the director of the Decorations committee to ask for >>information of _exactly_ when the ceremony will take place. If you would like to >>contact her yourself to maybe speed up the process here is her information: >> >>Sylvie Barsalou >>Coordinator, Decorations >>The Chancellery of Honours >>1-800-465-6890 > >I'll consider doing this on Monday. Please do. I tried myself today, and will try again Monday. > >>I have also spoken to A-Channel news requesting if they have any footage of the >>incident of June 24, 1999. The date I _was_ able to attain. The interview was >>aired on TV on the 25th. >> >>If proof is what is needed to clear my name and also his, I will without doubt >>get it. I stated fact as I knew it, possibly some events are not as clear as I >>hoped but I know they happened, and I know what is about to happen. > >You seem to have made some enemies via a bizarre incident involving $300 and a >computer. > >I don't understand how that could have happened -- all that needed to happen was >that someone needed to produce a receipt for shipping. That's incredibly easy >to do. If $300 is a trivial amount to Mr. Skinner, I'm sure that it would be >trivial to have the receipt scanned and posted on the web. > >If you are serious about holding an event, I think it would do everyone a lot of >good if you could get these matters cleared up. It seems obvious that they are >going to persist until you provide some proof of *something*. > >Some people are claiming that you, Mr. Skinner, and one other fellow, are the >same person. I am not Peter. I do not need to hide. If you notice Peter left the board after the accusations. I prefer to make people eat their fucking words. Including yours Bruce. > >If I can be of help in any of this, please let me know. I am an expert at >using the telephone, the post office, and a flat-bed scanner. As a more or >less neutral party, nobody would accuse me of making things up or playing >strange tricks. > >bruce I am not going to try to clean up someone else's mess. Peter's situation with this board does not affect me at all. If people wish to speculate they can all they want. I was simply trying to clear up that I am _not_ Peter. I believe it was Sarah that posted that I know Peter better than she knows her own husband. I do in fact know alot of Peter's business as I met him through his now ex-wife. I have known him for some time now. Personally I think what he did in the incident in 1999 was something special. Not everyone can say they _honestly_ saved a person's life.. let alone three. As for Vincent.. he has a problem with me as I poked a few jokes at him before and during CCT4. I asked if Diep was going to win "blindfolded" and if everyone was "chanceless" vs Diep. Of course he censored my like a child. Vincent loves to poke shit at others but when he recieves the same treatment he cowers like a fucking mule. Frankly I don't care whether he believes who I am. I will prove I am not Peter as I am meeting Yngvi Bjornsson from the University of Alberta in person on Monday to discuss how to plan the event. Surely a face to face meeting will not only prove I am who I say I am, but also that I am serious about the event. After Vincent and Christophe's claims that my planning was VERY similiar to Peter's I decided to ask him what _exactly_ his plans were. They are not even close to mine. He was trying to get airfare provided for people overseas at Christophe's request. I was going to do the same after it was brought up here. I never even thought about that as the WCCC did nothing to provide airfare for people coming from abroad. Peter's plans didn't include the existing chess community here. Mine did. Peter's was going to be held at a hotel. Mine was being planned for the UofA campus or the Edmonton Chess Club. There is almost nothing similiar about the way we were planning the event. Other than we both wanted it here in Edmonton. So once again there is more shit in the air other than mine. Other's are posting nothing but shit to try to discredit me when I have _nothing_ to do with the Galati situation. Maybe I should not have defended my friend, maybe I should have. I know for a fact there are some here that are complete fucking morons confusing fact with fiction. Vincent and Christophe come to mind. Kevin.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.