Author: Chessfun
Date: 00:32:11 07/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 20, 2002 at 02:26:44, George Sobala wrote: >Are the Tiger engines really equal under the Fritz v Chesspartner GUIs? Someone >called Harish just posted on rec.games.chess.computer various analysis times for >the Topa Dortmund sac: > >[D]r6r/k4pp1/pq2p2p/1p1n4/3N3P/1R6/PPP1QPP1/2KR4 w > >Claimed that on his P-3 550 CT14.0 TOOK 26 secs to find the sac under the Fritz >GUI, but only 2.3 sec under Chesspartner. Anyone care to confirm? (I know it >_is_ blindingly fast under Chesspartner, but don't have the Fritz GUI versions >of the engines) Or Christophe to comment? Chess Tiger 14.0 r6r/k4pp1/pq2p2p/1p1n4/3N3P/1R6/PPP1QPP1/2KR4 w - - 0 1 Analysis by Chess Tiger 14.0: 1.Qf3 Rhf8 2.Nf5 Rg8 3.Ne3 Nf6 4.Rbd3 ± (0.84) Depth: 7 00:00:00 163kN 1.Qf3 Rhf8 2.Nf5 Rg8 3.Ne7 Nxe7 4.Rd7+ Kb8 5.Qg3+ Kc8 6.Rxe7 ± (0.96) Depth: 8 00:00:00 231kN 1.Nxb5+ +- (1.74) Depth: 8 00:00:00 313kN 1.Nxb5+ axb5 2.Rxb5 Qd6 3.Rd4 Nc3 4.Qd2 Nxb5 5.Rxd6 Nxd6 6.Qxd6 +- (2.04) Depth: 8 00:00:01 374kN 1.Nxb5+ axb5 2.Rxb5 Qd6 3.Rd4 Nc3 4.bxc3 Qa3+ 5.Kb1 Rad8 6.Qf3 Rb8 7.Qxf7+ Ka8 +- (2.82) Depth: 9 00:00:01 461kN 1.Nxb5+ +- (3.72) Depth: 10 00:00:02 669kN 1.Nxb5+ axb5 2.Rxb5 Qc6 3.Rdxd5 exd5 4.Qe7+ Ka6 5.Rb3 Qb6 6.Rxb6+ Kxb6 7.Qd6+ Ka7 8.Qc7+ Ka6 +- (3.92) Depth: 10 00:00:03 1254kN 1.Nxb5+ axb5 2.Rxb5 Qc6 3.Rdxd5 exd5 4.Qe7+ Ka6 5.Rb3 Qb6 6.Rxb6+ Kxb6 7.Qd6+ Ka7 8.Qxd5 Rhc8 +- (4.14) Depth: 11 00:00:06 2205kN 1.Nxb5+ axb5 2.Rxb5 Rhc8 3.Rxb6 Kxb6 4.Qg4 g6 5.Kb1 Rc7 6.c4 Ra4 7.Qd4+ Kb7 8.b3 +- (4.10) Depth: 12 00:00:12 4553kN 1.Nxb5+ axb5 2.Rxb5 Rhc8 3.Rxb6 Kxb6 4.Qg4 g6 5.Kb1 Rc7 6.c4 Ra4 7.Qd4+ +- (4.10) Depth: 13 00:00:19 7253kN (, MyTown 20.07.2002) 00:00:00.1 0.82 7 128882 Nf5 Rhg8 Ne7 Nxe7 Rd7+ Kb8 Rxe7 00:00:00.6 0.84 7 163479 Qf3 Rhf8 Nf5 Rg8 Ne3 Nf6 Rbd3 00:00:00.3 0.96 8 231407 Qf3 Rhf8 Nf5 Rg8 Ne7 Nxe7 Rd7+ Kb8 Qg3+ Kc8 Rxe7 00:00:00.4 1.74 8 313417 Nxb5+ 00:00:01.3 2.04 8 374444 Nxb5+ axb5 Rxb5 Qd6 Rd4 Nc3 Qd2 Nxb5 Rxd6 Nxd6 Qxd6 00:00:01.7 2.82 9 461991 Nxb5+ axb5 Rxb5 Qd6 Rd4 Nc3 bxc3 Qa3+ Kb1 Rad8 Qf3 Rb8 Qxf7+ Ka8 00:00:01.4 3.72 10 669136 Nxb5+ 00:00:03.7 3.92 10 1254153 Nxb5+ axb5 Rxb5 Qc6 Rdxd5 exd5 Qe7+ Ka6 Rb3 Qb6 Rxb6+ Kxb6 Qd6+ Ka7 Qc7+ Ka6 00:00:05.2 4.14 11 2205490 Nxb5+ axb5 Rxb5 Qc6 Rdxd5 exd5 Qe7+ Ka6 Rb3 Qb6 Rxb6+ Kxb6 Qd6+ Ka7 Qxd5 Rhc8 00:00:11.4 4.10 12 4553122 Nxb5+ axb5 Rxb5 Rhc8 Rxb6 Kxb6 Qg4 g6 Kb1 Rc7 c4 Ra4 Qd4+ Kb7 b3 00:00:18.3 4.10 13 7253521 Nxb5+ axb5 Rxb5 Rhc8 Rxb6 Kxb6 Qg4 g6 Kb1 Rc7 c4 Ra4 Qd4+ Looks the same to me in both cases at depth 8. This is on a TB 1400 both at 96 Mb. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.