Author: Hannu Wegner
Date: 05:33:54 08/08/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 04, 1998 at 14:37:16, Moritz Berger wrote: >On August 04, 1998 at 05:14:45, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On August 03, 1998 at 23:37:36, Ed Schröder wrote: >> >>>>Make it a Fritz engine :)! >>> >>>Never -:) >>> >>>Why should I shoot in my own foot? >>> >>>- Ed - >> >>I have a good question: >> >>why did mark Uniacke (Hiarcs6) shot in his own foot by giving chessBase >>its engine ?! >>It is obvious that people who have hiarcs6-engine will not buy hiarcs6-dos. >> >>Do you understand this Ed ?! > >I know 3 people who have the Hiarcs6/Fritz engine. >All of them also own the Hiarcs6/DOS version for several reasons: > >1. Opening book optimized for Hiarcs 6 >2. EPD support >3. Works with Chess Assistant >4. Auto232/Chess232 support >5. Potentially faster than Hiarcs6/Fritz >6. Different playing styles (Solid, Normal, Aggressive instead of only "normal") >7. Different selectivity settings >8. Fischer Random support >9. Contempt factor >10. Rating feature >11. Mark position/goto keypoint features for post mortem analysis >12. Different output of "game analysis" when compared with Fritz engines >(Hiarcs6/DOS gives the usual "computer best line + score" analysis) > >Why don't you try pissing on another tree just for a change, Thorsten? > > >Moritz Don't forget the compability to the smartboard (Tasc) Hannu Wegner
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.