Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What do you think of time control of 1 second per game for the bullet

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 13:01:51 07/20/02

Go up one level in this thread


On July 20, 2002 at 15:43:03, stuart taylor wrote:

>On July 19, 2002 at 11:14:13, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On July 19, 2002 at 10:31:09, stuart taylor wrote:
>>
>>>On July 19, 2002 at 10:24:36, stuart taylor wrote:
>>>
>>>>On July 19, 2002 at 09:54:08, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>world championship.
>>>>>
>>>>>I suggest that the rules can say that the games are
>>>>>played under winboard(pondering off,animation off).
>>>>>
>>>>>Every 2 programs can play 100 or even more games between
>>>>>them so the total number of games of every program can be
>>>>>at least 5000.
>>>>>
>>>>>I believe that we may get significant results
>>>>>by that idea.
>>>>>
>>>>>Uri
>>>>
>>>>Somewhat significant, I believe. Even if humans can do something decent in Blitz
>>>>timing, they would not be in any way to comparable to computers if they had only
>>>>1 second per move. But computers can reach a good few plies in that time, and
>>>>play very advanced tactics. No stupid mistakes CAN be made after a whole second.
>>>>S.Taylor
>>>Sorry, I made a mistake! One second per move, I see, was never a question. That
>>>would be great time for anyprogram to do almost anything decent.
>>> But I thought that one second per game meant much more than a second, as any
>>>move can take UP TO a second without being counted as anything at all, and ONE
>>>move is allowed one-to-two seconds. That is how things used to be, I think, if
>>>not now also.
>>>S.Taylor
>>
>>Programs that are designed correctly have no problem
>>to play 1 second per game under winboard without losing
>>on time.
>>
>>Uri
>
>I meant, Doesn't one second per game allow up to .99 of a second for every
>single move? (as less than one whole second is not counted as anything at all).
>S.Taylor

No

Computers know to count time better.

Even 0.01 second is counted.
I am not sure if it is the minimal time or
if the computer can count even less than it but
I suspect that it is the minimal time.


Here is some debug file under winboard

13059 <first : 2 -10 0 114 b8c6 b1c3
13059 <first : 2 -9 0 155 d7d5
13059 <first : 2 -4 0 199 d7d5 b1c3
13059 <first : 2 -3 0 295 d8g5
13059 <first : 2 0 1 353 d8g5 g2g4
13059 <first : 2 0 1 365 d8g5 g2g4
13059 <first : 3 31 1 772 d8g5 e2g4 b8c6
13059 <first : 3 31 1 976 d8g5 e2g4 b8c6
13059 <first : 4 22 2 2367 d8g5 g2g3 b8c6 b1c3
13069 <first : 4 22 3 3350 d8g5 g2g3 b8c6 b1c3

You can see that the time is constant and suddenly
jumps by 0.01 seconds from 13.059 to 13.069.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.