Author: Jim Monaghan
Date: 17:25:15 07/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
Um, .... Martin the diagram is OK. You're looking at the position at Black's 17th move. I had posted correctly from the game at Black's 19th move. Van Wely had played the manouvre ... Bh6+ and ... Bxd2+. So the White bishop at c3 is "gone". I had just thought that taking the WR, which proved so valuable in the concluding attack was the better piece to capture than the WB. Thanks for the reponses from you and GCP. Cheers, Jim On July 20, 2002 at 20:11:22, martin fierz wrote: >On July 20, 2002 at 17:23:26, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On July 20, 2002 at 16:54:16, martin fierz wrote: >> >>>>[D] r1b1k2r/1p1n1p1p/p4P2/4pP2/8/6Q1/PPPK1PBP/3R3q b kq - 0 19 >>> >>>black players never ventured this since that game, so the answer should be no. >>>only why? 19...Qxd1+ 20. Kxd1 a5 (same idea as in the game)!? 21. Bxe5 Ra6 >> >>Am I too tired or is Bxe5 a typo? >> >>-- >>GCP > >Bxe5 is not a typo, but the original diagram is wrong - i didnt check it; i was >looking at the game in chessbase. >here's what it should look like (in the other 2 diagrams, the bishop is on c3 as >it should be): > >[D] r1b1kb1r/1p1n1p1p/p4P2/4pP2/8/2B3Q1/PPP2PBP/2KR3q b kq - 0 17 > >aloha > martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.