Author: Geo Disher
Date: 05:27:21 07/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 21, 2002 at 08:05:33, Uri Blass wrote: >On July 21, 2002 at 07:32:32, Geo Disher wrote: > >>On July 19, 2002 at 15:32:05, Geo Disher wrote: >> >>>> >>>>So what? Their scores didn't show any such thing. The log showed that >>>>they liked Qb6 less each time they drove the search one ply deeper, until >>>>it got so low that axb5 had a higher score and they went with that. >>>> >>>OK it appears that no one has actually shown a current micro program that >>>evaluates axb5 over Qb6 (at least with twicking some settings). I am going to >>>run my little 2.4ghz until it does (I hope). It is currently very close using >>>Fritz 6. It currently shows .97 for axb5 and 1.0 for Qb6. It has been going >>>for only a few hours now and just like you said Blue did, the two evals are >>>getting closer and closer the longer it thinks. I know people have done this >>>before but maybe I can run this longer than some in the past using a faster >>>computer and get a different result. >> >>OK after 56 hours the evals are exactly the same .88 for axb5 and Qb6. >>Hopefully in another few days axb5 will surpass Qb6. > >It is not clear if axb5 is better than Qb6. >I believe that it is not better. > >Uri I realize this but I am betting that Deep blue understood this position better than you Uri :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.