Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 11:00:05 07/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 21, 2002 at 07:32:32, Geo Disher wrote: >On July 19, 2002 at 15:32:05, Geo Disher wrote: > >>> >>>So what? Their scores didn't show any such thing. The log showed that >>>they liked Qb6 less each time they drove the search one ply deeper, until >>>it got so low that axb5 had a higher score and they went with that. >>> >>OK it appears that no one has actually shown a current micro program that >>evaluates axb5 over Qb6 (at least with twicking some settings). I am going to >>run my little 2.4ghz until it does (I hope). It is currently very close using >>Fritz 6. It currently shows .97 for axb5 and 1.0 for Qb6. It has been going >>for only a few hours now and just like you said Blue did, the two evals are >>getting closer and closer the longer it thinks. I know people have done this >>before but maybe I can run this longer than some in the past using a faster >>computer and get a different result. > >OK after 56 hours the evals are exactly the same .88 for axb5 and Qb6. >Hopefully in another few days axb5 will surpass Qb6. Look out. _now_ you are proving that chessbase is dishonest as well, since _no_ computer can like axb5 better than Qb6, because Qb6 wins material and axb5 does not. We all know who said _that_. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.