Author: Günther Simon
Date: 13:55:44 07/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 21, 2002 at 14:24:08, Ed Schröder wrote: >On July 21, 2002 at 11:56:27, Jonas Cohonas wrote: > >>I agree with the winboard rebel idea, but it should then be WB/UCI rebel to make >>it complete :) >> >>Ed any chance?? > >I have no interest in an UCI conversion, the WB protocol is as far as I want to >go. I have tried the current Rebel (WB) which runs fine under the Chesspartner >interface also under the Arena interface but it runs very sloppy. I am >surprised, I thought that WB=WB, apparently not. I hope you have tested it under WB itself too not only under Chesspartner because its a bit too easy to say CP=WB but surprise surprise -> Arena~WB... WB(-called)progs should be tested under WB first of course because there is no 100% guarantee about exact implementation of the prot in any other GUI so far.(though I heard good about it in CP,CA and CM) Well lets see :) I am hopefully awaiting the new Rebel for almost WB play. Regards, Günther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.