Author: Matthew Hull
Date: 11:23:19 07/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 21, 2002 at 22:11:41, Geo Disher wrote: >On July 21, 2002 at 07:32:32, Geo Disher wrote: > >>On July 19, 2002 at 15:32:05, Geo Disher wrote: >> >>>> >>>>So what? Their scores didn't show any such thing. The log showed that >>>>they liked Qb6 less each time they drove the search one ply deeper, until >>>>it got so low that axb5 had a higher score and they went with that. >>>> >>>OK it appears that no one has actually shown a current micro program that >>>evaluates axb5 over Qb6 (at least with twicking some settings). I am going to >>>run my little 2.4ghz until it does (I hope). It is currently very close using >>>Fritz 6. It currently shows .97 for axb5 and 1.0 for Qb6. It has been going >>>for only a few hours now and just like you said Blue did, the two evals are >>>getting closer and closer the longer it thinks. I know people have done this >>>before but maybe I can run this longer than some in the past using a faster >>>computer and get a different result. >> >>OK after 56 hours the evals are exactly the same .88 for axb5 and Qb6. >>Hopefully in another few days axb5 will surpass Qb6. > >Well looks like I will have to start my test over again. My wife decided to use >the computer to create a birthday card. :(. Man, you need to get a Linux machine.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.