Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 17:38:39 07/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 22, 2002 at 19:20:56, David Dory wrote: >This Skinner-Strickland mess needs to be cleared up (if indeed that is still >possible), to ascertain whether Skinner and or Strickland (forget Wilke, he's >irrelevant at this time IMO) are just spoofing us with unwarranted lies, or not. > >I never doubted that Peter Skinner was real - he's in the phone book, address >and all. > >I have a real doubt about Strickland being an alias Skinner used, however. The >language, the depth of knowledge, overall point of view of Mr. Strickland was >just too uncanny for me. And Mr. Strickland is NOT in the phone book - surprise, >surprise! > >I would be surprised if somebody from UA Games Dept., contacts CCC, and states >that THEY KNOW STRICKLAND PERSONALLY - and that he is not our Mr. Skinner, and >his language and point of view do indeed match those of the Mr. Strickland who >posted up here to CCC. > >Mr. Skinner's heroic actions are great - but don't grant him a license to spoof >us all here with pseudonym's and pretentious lies. > >And that's exactly what happened here, in my opinion. I didn't even suspect it >at first - but every single post by Strickland drew that conclusion closer and >closer. > >Barring some evidence that can't be manufactured, I see it as the only one - >Mr. Skinner is using Kevin Strickland's name to post here. > >Why? Because his own validity got wiped out in the $300 computer sale incident. > >Which indicates to me, he lied about that also. > >I'll bet a dollar you can get a copy of a Fedex shipping receipt, for that >computer. > >No "receipt got lost", bullshit, Mr. Skinner. > >I try to have a lot of compassion for folk who make mistakes, but I don't like >being played for a fool. > >In my book, you're a cheat to Mr. Galati, and a liar HERE, and you must know >you've done NOTHING to prove otherwise, despite all your irrelevant statements >regarding your personal life, etc. > >All of that (your marriage problems, fire, etc.), have NOTHING to do with the >veracity of your statements here on CCC. > >That's my opinion. > >David You are not being made a fool of by any means. You are not even involved in anything relating to my past. My personal life statements prove only one thing. I am honest. I do not need to lie. Personally I don't give a crap what you think I have or haven't done. I am not the liar here. Why not ask Kevin who called me today to flame me for my email to Bruce. He states he was trying to help me. I say he was only trying to create more problems for me here. If you look at the flames against me I would have to say he did one hell of a job.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.