Author: pavel
Date: 05:28:19 07/23/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 22, 2002 at 17:02:32, Russell Reagan wrote: >On July 22, 2002 at 16:40:58, Jon Dart wrote: > >>I see zero chess content in this discussion. >> >>Can the interested parties take it off to email? >> >>I don't know or care about any of the participants, except >>insofar as they have something interesting to say about >>computer chess. >> >>--Jon > >Clearly this is an issue in the computer chess community. If not the entire >community, then it's at least a CCC issue. If you don't like either of those, >then it's a lingering issue from a person (or maybe two persons) who were >attempting to create a computer chess tournament. If that's not computer chess >related, I don't know what is. In other words, if they were originally >organizing a ping pong tournament and this was still going on, moderation would >have ended that talk a long time ago. If moderation had a problem with >something, they should have put an end to this LONG ago, not now. Besides, no >one is making you participate in CCC or read anyone's posts. > >Russell Russel, I probably have missed other posts (which I know I didn't), and the posts in those threads which actually relates to computerchess (hardly few, even not directly). All I see is biodata of a person, how many times his wife got married, what happened in his divorce settlement, and how he saved lives and how his best married his ex-wife, and he is still his best friend, and how his passwords were stollen from his computer, and how is supposed to recieve a medal. And how one group is working to prove he is nonsence and another group working to prove he is right. Truely related to computer chess. It is true no one is relating him (John Dart, who is by the way programmer of "Arasan", and a respective poster in this forum) to this discussion. But he has the right to voice against this crap. And it is also true, that the discussion on the face of the forum with more than half of the posters lured to the discussion, hardly encouraging any form of discussion relavent to computer chess. Now don't come with "them-being-european-not-wanting-to-have-CCtournament-in-N.America reason". Now what the moderators wish to do about this crap should be interesting. They don't make their own rules, they listen (or should) what the majority has to say. cheers, pavs ;)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.