Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 06:46:18 08/09/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 09, 1998 at 09:35:08, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >On August 09, 1998 at 08:48:42, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On August 09, 1998 at 07:22:45, Amir Ban wrote: > >>>According to the pgn the first five were 5+3, and the others 15+15, 15+3, 15+15, >>>20+5, 20+10. >>> >>>In the short 5 the score was 5-0 to crafty. In the longer 5 the score was >>>2.5-2.5. >>> >>>Seems like a definite trend. > >>I didn't notice the times in the pgn either... the last 30 games or so >>between Kim and Crafty are all 20 10... with the results I had previously >>summarized... I just wrote a short shell script to extract the first N >>games from the last 2 months history... I'll grab some more this afternoon >>and only include 20 10... > >According to search, only the last 11 games are standard. The 11th was a draw, >here are the other ten summarized, which does show +7 - 2 =1. > > 0 2551 crafty 2437 Kingway 1-0 [ sr 20 10] B13 Res 03-Aug-98 > 1 2449 Kingway 2537 crafty 0-1 [ sr 20 10] D31 Res 02-Aug-98 > 2 2535 crafty 2462 Kingway = [ sr 20 10] B23 NM 01-Aug-98 > 3 2458 Kingway 2539 crafty 1-0 [ sr 20 10] B40 Res 01-Aug-98 > 4 2560 crafty 2437 Kingway 1-0 [ sr 20 10] C15 Res 01-Aug-98 > 5 2569 crafty 2473 Kingway 1-0 [ sr 20 10] C01 Fla 26-Jul-98 > 6 2486 Kingway 2593 crafty 0-1 [ sr 20 10] C48 Res 23-Jul-98 > 7 2508 Kingway 2559 crafty 1-0 [ sr 20 5] B40 Res 19-Jul-98 > 8 2551 crafty 2485 Kingway 1-0 [ sr 15 15] A44 Res 06-Jul-98 > 9 2526 crafty 2499 Kingway 0-1 [ sr 15 15] C05 Res 05-Jul-98 > >Here are the last ten, so if you got something different than that, either ICC >made a mistake with the time control tag (unlikely but not completely >impossible) or Bob messed up with his script (more likely). > >Kingway is a good opponent, he is willing to put some time into the games. > >bruce I figured out I had screwed up after Amir pointed out the time controls. I had watched several of these, and wasn't aware that Kim was also tossing in a blitz game here and there. So my script just extracted "Kingway" games without looking... However, my search and your search produce slightly different results for some reason: aics% search +=crafty kingway standard Your search found 7 games: [5 0 2 = (white win,draw,black win)] 0 2551 crafty 2437 Kingway 1-0 [ sr 20 10] B13 Res 03-Aug-98 1 2449 Kingway 2537 crafty 0-1 [ sr 20 10] D31 Res 02-Aug-98 2 2560 crafty 2437 Kingway 1-0 [ sr 20 10] C15 Res 01-Aug-98 3 2569 crafty 2473 Kingway 1-0 [ sr 20 10] C01 Fla 26-Jul-98 4 2486 Kingway 2593 crafty 0-1 [ sr 20 10] C48 Res 23-Jul-98 5 2551 crafty 2485 Kingway 1-0 [ sr 15 15] A44 Res 06-Jul-98 6 2524 crafty 2479 Kingway 1-0 [ sr 15 7] C15 Res 05-Oct-97 aics% search -=crafty kingway standard Your search found 4 games: [3 0 1 = (white win,draw,black win)] 0 2458 Kingway 2539 crafty 1-0 [ sr 20 10] B40 Res 01-Aug-98 1 2508 Kingway 2559 crafty 1-0 [ sr 20 5] B40 Res 19-Jul-98 2 2526 crafty 2499 Kingway 0-1 [ sr 15 15] C05 Res 05-Jul-98 3 2494 Kingway 2509 crafty 1-0 [ sr 15 7] B40 Res 04-Oct-97 aics% search crafty kingway standard draw Your search found 2 games: [0 2 0 = (white win,draw,black win)] 0 2535 crafty 2462 Kingway = [ sr 20 10] B23 NM 01-Aug-98 1 2480 Kingway 2545 crafty = [ sr 15 3] D31 NM 05-Jul-98 so +7, -4, =2 if I didn't blow up the search command...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.