Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: MODERATION: Are complaints reasonable if it's about Bob? Many insults!

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 18:56:42 07/24/02

Go up one level in this thread


On July 24, 2002 at 13:46:48, Detlef Pordzik wrote:

>On July 23, 2002 at 18:22:02, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>I will add that I am more than willing to drop this discussion with you
>>here.  As I did in the other thread.  As I will likely do in _all_ future
>>threads again.  Because as always, discussions with you go absolutely
>>nowhere, over and over and over...
>>
>>Continue in whatever way you choose, but without me...
>
>Hi Bob,
>
>didn't chat for ages, did we ? :-)
>Doesn't depend.....
>
>Listen :
>why in hell you YOU think you gotta get involved in such a , well, crap again &
>again & revolving ?
>
>
>"It's the same ole story, tell me when does it end - it's the same ole Blues,
>same ole Blues -  again" ( Brian Ferry ).
>
>Remember the times and the true processes on RGCC - and you oughta remeber, whom
>you're dealin' with.
>
>The man - and his attitudes never changed - simply, because he : can't.
>
>Spreadin' rumour, 'causin' trouble, acting as a known to the NG makers of a
>reputated German NG as a steered underground assasinator -
>
>it allways was, is, and will be the same evil + ongoin' show with this chap.
>
>Just by the time you might read this - there has been a really terrible posting
>stated - unsigned, of course - in a rather new, German NG....which tells the
>storyline of the foundation of CCC to the public - in such an incredibly wrong,
>missleading and evil-destructive manner, that it's simply breathtakin'.....
>
>not ONE got spared, not Steven, not Thorsten, not you, not Ed - nobody...of
>course and without doubts :
>
>evil asd can be, all those mentioned gents....
>
>Now, guess who - I can't guarantee nor give proof -  but on the other hand I
>still can count 1 + 1....
>
>you, especially you and all the other elegibles I know from the past here
>haven't got the slightest needs to express, argue about or to declare anything
>to a somebody, who'se exeptional attitude is the one, we all know - for ages....



I can think of _two_ people that might have written that distorted piece
of nonsense.  Either separately or together.  Regardless, it is nonsense
from the beginning to end.  However, I have learned to ignore things that
the rest of the world can brand as "crapola" easily.  It just isn't worth
the effort to correct them...




>
>c'mon, man !
>Just forget it - you waste your precious time...
>


There we certainly are in agreement....



>Best
>
>EL



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.