Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 10:21:59 07/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 25, 2002 at 12:34:06, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On July 25, 2002 at 11:24:10, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On July 24, 2002 at 23:13:54, Bruce Moreland wrote: >> >>>On July 24, 2002 at 14:09:05, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>> >>>>For all of you who want to study the mentioned article, here is the URL >>>> >>>>http://f50.parsimony.net/forum200318/messages/1063.htm >>> >>>Rolf didn't write this. That had to have been written by someone inside the >>>founder's group, and anyone who has been paying attention knows the style of the >>>author. >>> >>>bruce >> >> >>I agree. I am _certain_ about who wrote it. Although it could have been >>in cooperation with Rolf. Since the obvious author and Rolf sort of >>"reconnected" later in r.g.c.c... >> >>:) > >Bob, >is this now the new style in CCC? You as a moderator you speculate or others >insinuate, that I wrote such an article? Why don't you re-read what I wrote. I _specifically_ said that I knew who wrote it, although it was possible they collaborated with you in doing so." If I know who it was, and I suspect he could have collaborated with you to do so, then how could you have been the author? You collaborated with yourself? Try again... > >Show me one single part of data in that article that could have been made or >even influenced or my idea! Oh, the part about Ed. Etc... > >Most of these details, what who did for the business, what he did not, what who >did when and after what "band-waggoning" (quote from the article) I did _not_ >know! And could not know - because I was not a member of the specific groups. I don't disagree. > >So I ask you if this is honest if you tear me into such a topic. I didn't tear you into anything. However, you and the "author" did do a lot of collaboration/back-patting/attaboying over in r.g.c.c a while back. Recall that??? > >You could do a way better job if you finally presented the data from Crafty in >the axb5 position of DB2 in 1997. Did you read the results from HIARCS 8? No >narrowing after 30 hours. So? "no computer can" doesn't mean _every_ computer must before the statement can be proven. Only one is enough. We already have fritz. And with Crafty being about .08 apart on the two moves, that is close enough so that if it played either I wouldn't immediately think that someone had helped it... > >In sum - could you come back on-topic and leave speculations and ad-hominem >insults to others as a moderator? You cn try what you want - I would never >violate the charta of this forum, so it's senseless to provoke me. I'm not provoking _anybody_. But then I am not engaged in the things you like to do either. You _try_ to provoke so you can claim "foul". You try to mislead and twist things. As elvis said, it is all in your history... > > >Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.