Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 13:37:59 07/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 25, 2002 at 13:15:45, David Dory wrote: >>>>>On July 23, 2002 at 11:58:42, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>>>>>It's indecent and insulting to use metaphors of being able to follow a cow >>>>>>walking down the street _in case of a physically handicapped_! You haven't >>>>>>learned your kindergarden lesson good enough yet. > >No insult is given by the "follow the cow" metaphor. It is just an example of a >slow moving mind when a faster one is needed. We have all "followed the cow" >from time to time. I don't know if you are from the USA, anyway, most of the readers here come from the US, and Bob Hyatt surely does come from there, so let me be quite clear about this - plays with language or on the basis of idiomatic specialties in the communication with foreigners, and I'm a foreigner, I'm not a native English speaker, is impolite. In my case this walking behind a cow get a drift if you know that walking is not my favorite passtime as a physical handicapped. Bob knows this since long. BTW this sort of direct ad hominem has a long tradition in our communication. If I said ROFL, because I liked the special movement I could never do and because it looks so similar to my name Bob used to answer "Rotten" on the floor - now isn't it nice? You get it I hope. As to the rest I hope that you'll understand the difference between distributing verdicts without any content and a debate. And that my writing is _very_ inappropiate, this is nothing new to me. My comments are even _"idiotic"_ (Hyatt)! And note well, here in CCC it's about 'me' against Bob plus all the "rest" (Hyatt). So, from that angle you'll get that I am really strange by _definition_. And Bob said it as a _moderator_ which is even more than 'proof' could do. Could you read the charta for CCC? Rolf Tueschen > >Hyatt's topic was ONLY regarding the move axb5. You have taken that and thrown >in everything else, including the kitchen sink! That is inappropriate, Rolf. > >Nothing can be proven about DB's team match conduct. If you believe they were >cheating Kasparov, nothing can be found to prove otherwise. If you believe they >were honest, again, nothing can be found to support cheating. > >Therefore, please be logical and stop wasting all this time on the DB cheating >topic. It won't change anything, and nothing can be proven. > >Frankly, I see it as a pure troll - with no redeeming value whatsoever, at this >time. If you were to write forever, you wouldn't change a thing, so what's the >purpose?? You can't discover anything new, and every topic has been discussed to >death. Please stop. It's the only logical thing to do at this time, I think you >will agree. > >The other poster who got upset with you did so because you have a marked >tendency to drift quickly off topic, more descriptively, to jump from the >objective part of a subject, into the subjective part of that subject, very >quickly. > >People who frequent CCC tend to like objective chess problems and idea's - and >want little or nothing to do with any possible subjective problems or idea's. >They are more programmer than psychiatrist, by far! > >If you can keep your posts into the objective realm and focused, I'm sure you'll >have a far better experience here on CCC. > >David > >P.S. Clearly you didn't write that article on the founding of CCC. No worries, >:)
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.