Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 05:07:17 07/26/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 26, 2002 at 07:29:22, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >1. you are not serious in my eyes because you don't get it where the offense >does come from if someone is using such metaphors intentiously. It's impolite >against a foreigner and more so disgustful against a physically handicapped. > >2. please stop that patronizing behaviour. It is not ok according to the charta >of this forum. Because computerchess is the topic and _not_ how I should deal >with insults coming from US Americans. Well as they say: "If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen". IMO you have been quite patronizing yourself at times, to give you a few examples: 1) "Get it? Let me teach you a lesson!" 2) "If you are a beginner or very young indeed, then please forget it what I wrote here, because then you might not be able to understand what I was talking about." It is _easy_ to find more. I personally have nothing against you, but I can't find neither heads or tails in your very wordy essays. There is little sense in accusing IBM of cheating, first of all you have no proof, which makes it all a big bag of wind to start with. Second, what chessplayer would they have hired to beat the best human chessplayer, deep blue was probably the only really chance they had at beating him! So these highly subjective speculations tend to get hammered here, not only because some find them illogical, but also because you appear to have some agenda (which is borderline trolling). If you intend to persist until we are all convinced you are right, you will be wasting a lot of time, IMO. My advice to you would be to keep it short and to the point and leave out the philosophical elements, they belong in CTF. -S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.