Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:40:54 07/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 27, 2002 at 03:33:37, Terry McCracken wrote: >On July 27, 2002 at 03:21:21, Joseph Merolle wrote: > >>When it comes to stricly combinations are tactically based programs like the >>tigers better then the world champions? > >Simply put no. Deep combinations are the forte of GM and IM tacticians. There are a lot of combinations that are not deep and computers are better in tactics than humans(humans may find combinations that computers do not see but I suspect that they find it for positional reasons. I do not know about a single position from games and not from studies when humans can be faster than computers in seeing a forced mate. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.