Author: Thomas Lagershausen
Date: 09:28:28 07/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 27, 2002 at 11:22:01, Marc van Hal wrote: >On July 26, 2002 at 17:33:50, Patrick Jansen wrote: > >>[D]2b1rb1k/2r2ppp/n2p4/3P2PN/3NPQ2/2p3RP/1q3PK1/1B1R4 w - - >> >>With 37.Nh5-f6 !! white crahes the black position > >You also must considering the folowing Gm's many times make sacrefice on >intuation too A look at the importance of the tournament make clear that is nonsense to speak of a sacrifice of intuation. >If it simply works out it only tells us something of the will to win. >Rather then being corectly. >It also can be so that such a position was the result. >from longterm homebrew analyses. I am hearing Anand laughing. You have to much fantasy.This was move 37 and Anand found all this on the board.Let´s take a look at the clock.(smile) > >It is of much more importance how a program plays then how it knows to solve >chessproblems Jesus help.This is move 37 of the game.... Where do you see a chessproblem? To make a long story short the most programs have not the ability to play this game in the right spirit. Why is it so difficult to accept that? Humans are at the moment the better chessplayer.Is this a problem for you? Sorry, but i think this words have to be spoken. Regards TL > >Or it must be so that programs start to make sacrefices on intuition >Or a long term positional sacrefice. >I think this will take a long time! >especialy if it did not find this position as good for White the position never >would have acured in the first place! > >Regards Marc van Hal
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.