Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 10:40:28 07/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 27, 2002 at 12:28:28, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >On July 27, 2002 at 11:22:01, Marc van Hal wrote: > >>On July 26, 2002 at 17:33:50, Patrick Jansen wrote: >> >>>[D]2b1rb1k/2r2ppp/n2p4/3P2PN/3NPQ2/2p3RP/1q3PK1/1B1R4 w - - >>> >>>With 37.Nh5-f6 !! white crahes the black position >> >>You also must considering the folowing Gm's many times make sacrefice on >>intuation too > >A look at the importance of the tournament make clear that is nonsense to speak >of a sacrifice of intuation. > >>If it simply works out it only tells us something of the will to win. >>Rather then being corectly. >>It also can be so that such a position was the result. >>from longterm homebrew analyses. > >I am hearing Anand laughing. You have to much fantasy.This was move 37 and Anand >found all this on the board.Let´s take a look at the clock.(smile) > >> >>It is of much more importance how a program plays then how it knows to solve >>chessproblems > >Jesus help.This is move 37 of the game.... >Where do you see a chessproblem? > >To make a long story short the most programs have not the ability to play this >game in the right spirit. > >Why is it so difficult to accept that? > >Humans are at the moment the better chessplayer.Is this a problem for you? > >Sorry, but i think this words have to be spoken. > >Regards > >TL > Ok but I gues you also have troubles with the term chessproblem. Marc >> >>Or it must be so that programs start to make sacrefices on intuition >>Or a long term positional sacrefice. >>I think this will take a long time! >>especialy if it did not find this position as good for White the position never >>would have acured in the first place! >> >>Regards Marc van Hal
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.