Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Moderation please Second time (Pordzik)

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 11:38:46 07/28/02

Go up one level in this thread


On July 28, 2002 at 12:59:57, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>
>I think it is a testament to the moderators past and present that you are
>allowed to post here, _period_ after your nonsense in r.g.c.c...  I suggest
>that you simply stop your nonsense here and post reasonable stuff.  If you
>start to demand moderation policy changes, it is very possible that _you_
>will be the first recipient of those changes...
>

Look, I do not post nonsense IMO. Period.

For me the most important is that I post absolutely peacefully. Now, if you
think that I am still not in accordance to the charta here, I have no remedy
against it.

Here I do _not_ ask you to change moderators politics at all. But I never heard
before that it can be possible here that posters could insult others the way
Pordzik did it.

I repeat to you and you can take this also as my oath, that I did not, do not
work for CSS as a "steered underground assassinative (!)" and I wished that you
would agree that this is not good behaviour in CCC to post it.

Are you serious that such character assissantion by Pordzik is "nonsense" by
_me_ when I contact you as a moderator?

You know what, I would even digest that pill, if you insist. You are in power
here. I would like that you wrote this clear here that you won't accept a
complaint from my side in this affaire. Then I know it. Then I would take back
my complaints against Pordzik and knew that in American English it wouldn't be
character assassination if someone called someone steered underground
assassinate.

NB that I had to write on the topic because you couldn't certify the input of
the emails I sent to CCC and that were admitted to be received automatically.

Rolf Tueschen



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.