Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 18:50:02 07/28/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 28, 2002 at 14:38:46, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On July 28, 2002 at 12:59:57, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >> >>I think it is a testament to the moderators past and present that you are >>allowed to post here, _period_ after your nonsense in r.g.c.c... I suggest >>that you simply stop your nonsense here and post reasonable stuff. If you >>start to demand moderation policy changes, it is very possible that _you_ >>will be the first recipient of those changes... >> > >Look, I do not post nonsense IMO. Period. > Sorry to disagree, but a _lot_ of what you post is utter nonsens.e. For example... I tell you something can't be done. I explain why. I give you specific reasons why it can't be done. How do you respond? By saying "it can be done, you guys just haven't taken the time to do it." You don't address _any_ issues I bring up. You don't attack any reasons that I give as to why it can't be done.. You just ramble on and on about things that are not even related to the discussion. And _that_ is "utter nonsense"... You simply need to learn a few basic debating skills. Simply saying "is too" is not convincing as an argument... >For me the most important is that I post absolutely peacefully. Now, if you >think that I am still not in accordance to the charta here, I have no remedy >against it. > >Here I do _not_ ask you to change moderators politics at all. But I never heard >before that it can be possible here that posters could insult others the way >Pordzik did it. He simply stated a reminder for days gone past... The problem is that the reminder was _not_ false... > >I repeat to you and you can take this also as my oath, that I did not, do not >work for CSS as a "steered underground assassinative (!)" and I wished that you >would agree that this is not good behaviour in CCC to post it. I didn't see that, I didn't receive any complaint about it, and I can only say that I (as a moderator) do _not_ read every post here. If you have a complaint, let us know via moderator. We will either take action or tell you why no action is appropriate. But whining _in_ a thread is not going to get our attention. > >Are you serious that such character assissantion by Pordzik is "nonsense" by >_me_ when I contact you as a moderator? > Since you haven't contacted me as a moderator, I can't speculate... >You know what, I would even digest that pill, if you insist. You are in power >here. I would like that you wrote this clear here that you won't accept a >complaint from my side in this affaire. Did you see me say that? Or is this something that you want to imply now, and then state as fact at some point in the future, as if saying it often enough will make it true? >Then I know it. Then I would take back >my complaints against Pordzik and knew that in American English it wouldn't be >character assassination if someone called someone steered underground >assassinate. > >NB that I had to write on the topic because you couldn't certify the input of >the emails I sent to CCC and that were admitted to be received automatically. > >Rolf Tueschen I receive moderator email every day concerning new members. I have received a few complaints in past weeks about various topics, so everything is working on my end...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.