Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 08:34:07 07/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 29, 2002 at 10:58:43, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>You _did_ say they cheated, hundreds of times. Just look for author=Tueschen, >>>keyword=cheat, newsgroup=rec.games.chess.computer. You didn't just do it >>>once, you did it hundreds of times. And it is all there in black and white >>>in a permanent medium for anyone to find. >> >>No. >>What I found with the words you meantiones is this: >>http://www.clubkasparov.ru/rev/newsgroups/group02_e.htm >>And this is nothing I had said. I did NEVER write something that 75% of the >>online players cheated. This is clear forgery by the author there. I did never >>say such a think. > >Give me a break. We are talking about _deep blue_. There are dozens of >posts by you in deja where you say "they cheated Kasparov" or "they were a >cheat" or "the match was a big cheat" and so forth. What should this lead to? I write where I can that this is a science related topic and you continue to quote out of context. I did never say such somehing that they were a cheat. This is insulting! Please do not continue this. I did not say this. I used the term always in that direct context. Also the whole output question has a very basic science context. It's not _my_ invention! I just talk about average science. Results without control of the output are a problem. So will you please stop to insinuate as if I had ever called the team members or IBM as if they were criminals. I was talking about science. I hope that science won't be changed by public acclamation here. Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.